Whilst going over with Jeffrey T Angley P. C. we had been advised that a civil engineer generally styles the actual side to side element of a land improvement task. Their accountabilities consist of coming up with site facilities things including utilities (drainage, sewage, water), freeway design and style, parking lot layout, septic systems, and so on and present land setting up, design and construction management services regarding housing, business oriented, institutional and recreational assignments for private and non-private consumers.
In accordance with Phillips & Angley maximum projects, most of us commonly get involved in the actual inception with the projects by means of viability studies to identify , progression alternatives for buyers and guide all of them tips on how to make best use of their own area inside local, state and federal allowing for restrictions. The moment the style and design enhancement phase is finished, we document with community boards [and relevant federal and state authorities] for your enabling phase. Essentially the most labor-intensive section regarding MEG staff is the particular layout improvement period.
Jeffrey T. Angley was informed that inside the civil engineering field there are lots of areas of expertise. Jeffrey T Angley could think about civil engineering to extensively cover geotechnical, structural, travel, environmental engineering, as well as sanitary engineering disciplines. At MEG, we have now technical engineers focusing on [disciplines that include] land planning, utility layout (water drainage, sewer, water, and so forth.), septic programs and also wastewater treatment services, architectural as well as environmental engineering. A lot of people begin to are skilled while in school by simply choosing a specific discipline, but usually what we discover is that often within the very first 10 years of a person's career, granted their knowledge and also the company they will often help, they're exposed to plenty of procedures and then move towards a unique one sooner or later.
One region that we are finding far more specialists straining will be sustainable style and design. It can be often recently been invited by the state and in most cases on the local stage. Our participation as civil technicians and with LEED accreditations is usually supportable style and utilizing reduced effect water flow (LID) design, which generally calls for much less houses similar to reducing, catch basin as well as manholes, and even more best administration routines for instance greased swales, and also raingadrens and style these characteristics taking into consideration the all-natural surfaces to make sure they far better comport to current geography along with the conditions.
What precisely we've often experienced since 2005 and 2006 forward, could be that the point out is attempting to facilitate allowing operations and remove layers involving bureaucracy and ineffectiveness. As an example, natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP) has developed new regulations which are additional tailor-made and facilitate the actual permit process without a doubt vulnerable species. The Office of Environmental Protection (DEP) has removed the actual Sewer Extension Permit Program this summer (2012) and has furthermore presented a good quick form of wetland letting whenever processing notices of intent (NOI).
Also, in 2010, Massachusetts transferred the Permit Extension Act, also it was only extended for another 2 yrs this summer (2012). That [legislation and extension] is the one most significant and also accelerating transformation that has been created in relation to positive economical impacts to our clients'' campaigns.
Then again, as you move the state government adjusted within a optimistic path, additional cities are generally building tighter zoning and wetland bylaws which lead to making local permitting tasks more restrictive. There have not really been too many substantive changes in enabling land development campaigns on the government level.
Various other trends we have been seeing: Numerous towns have given inclusionary zoning (affordable housing) elements in their zoning bylaws and have added group subdivisions, adaptable open area, and also other overlay regions that allow bigger density projects to discourage builders someone through permitting complete permit jobs underneath n M.G.L. Ch. 40B. Cities are actually additional assertive within creating their particular economical real estate bylaws, to be able to stay away from being targets pertaining to 40B and determine exactly where cost-effective property is usually designed.
To understand more details on the Jeffrey T Angley P. C and real estate law, visit - Jeffrey T Angley at - http://www.jeffreytangleypc.com/
Article Source : http://jeffreytangleypc.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/jeffrey-t-angleys-discussion-with-bradley-c-mckenzie/
It is definitely regular to hear about tree trimming cases where a landowner wants to cut the branches of a the next door neighbors tree that overhang the common boundary line-which is actually authorized, to a point-or actually those cases when an individual trespasses to the property of another in order to cut or perhaps decrease trees and shrubs completely situated upon that lot-which is actually illegitimate. Regardless of the underlying reason regarding these kinds of cutting down on as well as chopping, Massachusetts legislation is reasonably distinct about whether responsibility as well as damages may take place within those scenarios informs Jeffery T. Angley.
But have you considered any time a tree equally straddles two lots? Not just the branches, but the principal trunk by itself? Who is the owner of the actual sapling, as well as, most importantly, can all or a portion of it be legally taken off? These criteria grow to be critical each time a landowner wishes to make improvements on or within the boundary line which require removal of the tree.
Interestingly enough, Massachusetts case law is essentially unclear about just what rights are available whenever a tree trunk grows across a boundary line. In one case, Levine v. Black, 312 Mass. 242 (1942), the court had the capacity to address the problem, however eventually punted. At best, the Levine court noted that amongst other areas the particular tree was regarded as being owned as tenants in common relating to the two nearby components, or even that every landowner owned the actual portion of the tree on his respected lot, but didn't specifically determine which legal rights apply in Massachusetts.
Quoting Levine, a reasonably current tree chopping decision (under Rule 1:28) issued by the Appeals Court ordered that complete value damages be paid for cutting a tree that straddled the boundary line. The decision failed to state the type of property rights that supports the actual awarded damages, and just vaguely referred towards the existence of legal rights inside the tree that protect against another's unilateral actions which causes harm to or even destroys the actual tree. See Lasell College v. Fox, 53 Mass. App. Ct. 1103 (Nov. 2, 2001) ("Each of the parties held a legal interest in that part of the tree on his own property but also had the right to prevent the other party from dealing with part of the tree so as to injure or destroy the whole tree.").
Within some other areas, the courts have more or less supported the concept a tree increasing on two lots is actually held as renters in common or collectively, and that this kind of trees and shrubs can not be destroyed with out permission, nor may they be clipped to be able to cause material damage. See, e.g., Garcia v. Sanchez, 108 N.M. 388 (1989) (citing Annotation, Rights and Liabilities of Adjoining Landowners As to Trees, Shrubbery, or Similar Plants Growing on Boundary Line, 26 A.L.R.3d 1372, 1374-1375 (1969)); Young v. Ledford, 37 So.3d 832 (Ala.Civ.App. 2009), writ of mandamus denied Young v. Ledford, 79 So.3d 656 (Ala. Civ. App., 2011), (reversing lower court order that authorized removal of entire boundary line tree because, under Alabama law, "[i]n the special case of a boundary-line tree, ... each adjacent landowner has ownership rights that can't be trumped by the other's desires in the manner suggested by the trial court's judgment") informs an insider from Jeffery T. Angley.
So what's a landowner to try and do? At minimum, every time a tree can be found to be developing about two lots, the sensible landowner ought to seek out the consent of his neighbor when it is required to eliminate or substantially reduce the tree. According to the situations prompting the particular tree removal, agreement might be given if the neighbor is reasonable. However, in those situations where the neighbor is unwilling to get the tree cut down, feasible choices include revising plans so that it does not require any kind of tree removing or substantial trimming to the point of harm or even bringing a declaratory judgment action in court to have the court determine the parties' respective rights.
To understand more details on the Jeffrey T Angley P. C and real estate law, visit - Jeffrey T Angley at - http://www.jeffreytangleypc.com/
Article Source - http://www.jeffreytangleypc.com/blog/2012/08/trees-boundary-lines-important-considerations.shtml
Depending on Phillips & Angley, in advance of beginning any excavation task like tunneling as well as blasting, developers and landowners need to know the often-overlooked responsibility they will owe to neighboring properties in order to avoid nuisance or negligence responsibility.
A landowner owes an obligation of lateral-subjacent help to adjoining properties. Therefore, all property owners are entitled to expect that naturally occurring soil and water situations, including the lateral service offered by adjoining properties, will remain in their natural status. It is really an natural property right.
However, what happens when a parcel of land needs to be excavated for development? Are there consequences for or considerations to be made by the developer or landowner? Jeffrey T Angley says, of course, is yes. The reason for this is that it is well settled that for an excavation causing an injury to the soil of an adjoining owner in its natural state an action will lie, but that no recovery will be allowed in the absence of negligence or a direct trespass for an injury to structures by excavating the adjoining land.
There will be strict accountability for landowners (or their contractors) that digs blast or tunnel on their land if they take away or injure the lateral help benefitting adjacent property and damage the land in its natural status.
When it comes to removal of bedrock for development, certain methods of excavation and blasting are more destructive than others. This depends on the nature of the project site in relation to its surroundings. For example, shock waves, vibrations, and cracks and fissures in the bedrock extending beyond the property line-are just some of the potential consequences of blasting. This can create an unsafe and hazardous situation for adjoining properties, and potentially subject the developer and/or landowner to claims of nuisance and negligence from adjoining property owners.
For that reason, while excavation as well as related growth is definitely not restricted, this will require several forethought, especially due to the fact interference with lateral support or conduct regarded a trespass or negligent can translate into money damages owed to affected properties.
Developers, contractors and adjoining landowners can take some precautions as mentioned below:
Evaluate and understand the recommended excavation plans just before permits are issued, if possible, but certainly, ahead of excavation will start. This overview will need the expertise and input of experienced geotechnical experts and engineers. They shall be looking to assess if the plans will cause harm to surrounding properties.
For projects requiring blasting, consider alternative methods of excavation and mitigation in light of the proximity of surrounding properties, buildings and uses. There are often less intrusive methods of excavation available to developers that could help avoid the potential for negligence.
Understand that some neighboring property, structures and uses-such as towers and antennas anchored with person wires deep into the bedrock-may not have typical blasting criteria that will permit for a reliable blasting plan. This is where developers need to be particularly sensitive to alternative methods of excavation.
Developers and contractors must remember that it is no defence to a valid nuisance claim that their conduct was under the guise of a duly issued permit. Their conduct, notwithstanding the town or city's approval, can still result in a lawsuit if it substantially and unreasonably interferes with another landowner's use and enjoyment of his land.
In general, it is extremely important that any specific excavation or blasting venture prevent disrupting or destroying the lateral support presented to neighboring properties.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is general in nature and for educational purposes only. No personal legal advice is being provided. If you have an actual legal issue that needs to be addressed, you should seek the advice of competent legal counsel.
The author writes helpful content articles about the several legal issues, Jeffrey T Angley P. C and has an experience of working with several law firms such as Jeffrey T Angley P. C. The author takes in inspiration from the legal works of Phillips & Angley to find out more about the same see - http://www.manta.com/c/mm3vzhb/phillips-angley. For Article Resource head to - http://www.jeffreytangleypc.com/blog/2012/08/excavation-blasting-activities-the-duty-of-lateral-support.shtml
Keeping peace with the neighbours is quite a process particularly if you need to develop something totally new around your place. Conflicts between nearby neighbours will be frequent and one of the most prevalent reasons for these kinds of debates could be categorized as Boundary Disagreements. Reported by Jeffery T Angley a solid, focused counsel for Massachusetts Land owners and builders boundary quarrels can come up in several methods. A lot of these factors could be as small as installing a fence or septic system to claims of possession on a piece of land that shares a common border regarding the next door neighbors.
One other reason with regard to boundary disputes according to Jeffrey T Angley P. C. could be very intriguing where a landowner discovers that his property has been recently encroached on by another home-owner. This is often because of the reason that property lines are not really positioned as initially thought and this kind of drawback comes into light only after a survey carried out by a qualified land surveyor.
These types of differences aren't in reality confined to developed properties only and there is enough of chance that such border conflicts might arise in undeveloped properties also. After all these undeveloped properties are also gonna be developed eventually and property owners should keep an eye on these kind of properties to determine their properties remain the way they were when they bought it. Strange border faults could appear whilst subdividing these types of premises.
There are several approaches to litigate most of these border disagreements. The actual titles to which these types of litigations could be dealt out are readily available with solicitors who can ensure after having a in-depth analysis of the contest regarding which title will certainly best fit in the current set up. Solicitors at Phillips & Angley believe deeds would be the key source of evidence in boundary disagreements regardless of the factor the boundary contest is actually arising from. Only one ought to be careful while taking deeds under consideration as proof in Boundary Disputes as early deeds have their own confines.
These types of old deeds could have a number of weaknesses as aged monuments similar to trees may no longer be there about the genuine site. Fuzzy and imprecise wordings again add to the problem with these old deeds. Besides this there's always a possibility that two different surveyors may possibly report two distinct reports for the very same property which further complicate the particular deed and ruin its likelihood of being provided in the court as material data.
Litigants will not need to loose hope as there are a number of other records that may be presented in the courtroom as evidence. These kinds of documents might be assessor's plans, ancient charts, shots, instrument surveys carried out by a competent land surveyor, Land Court registration plans, testimony about prior use of the area etc. It hardly matters how a boundary dispute starts its essential for one to get hold of the required paperwork and material evidence, evaluate it with pros similar to Jeffery T Angley and work for the ultimate purpose that is certainly fixing the boundary dispute.
For more details on Jeffrey T. Angley, P.C., Jeffrey T. Angley and Phillips & Angley visit - http://www.jeffreytangleypc.com/
Article Source: http://jeffreytangleypc.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/boundary-disputes-an-observation-by-jeffery-t-angley/
Disclaimer - The content presented inside the post is basic and plans to provide information which has to be cross checked with the concerned industry experts. Virtually no Personal legal advice will probably be provided to anybody via this particular publish. In case you have a legal problem make sure you contact a attorney.
As we brace for the after-math of the S&P downgrade of US credit, we thought we’d pass along any good news we can find. McGraw-Hill Construction reports that new construction starts were up 15% in June over May figures, to the highest reading for the Dodge index this year. Nonresidential building surged 11%, nonbuilding (roads/infrastructure) climbed 34% and residential building ticked up 1%. The largest projects of nonresidential building were privately-funded projects, which is a good sign. Large projects are: $160 million corporate campus in Houston, TX $147 million federal building in Ft. Snelling, MN $75 million distribution center for Amazon.com in SC $60 million corporate campus renovation in Seattle, WA $50 million hotel renovation in Philadelphia, PA Institutional construction forged ahead 15%, with the aid of several large hospitals, and entertainment/amusement construction was buoyed by several large projects to show an increase of 90% over May. In full disclosure, the June numbers look good (and they’re not BAD) because May had been so dismal. Nationally, the first six months of 2011 are 7% behind the same period for 2010 in total new construction starts, with the South Atlantic region down 10%. But here’s hoping that we’re beginning to see some brightening of the economic gloom of the past three years. If Phillips & angley can assist you in preparing door and door hardware specifications that offer your owners and clients VALUE, please let us know! We can work within your fee structure to meet your needs. If you are a landowner or developer in Eastern Massachusetts, the attorney who protects your rights in any real estate legal matter is Jeffrey T. Angley, founding member of the law offices of Jeffrey T. Angley, P.C., and principal of Phillips & Angley.
For the tenth straight month, real estate transactions continue to trend positively in Massachusetts. Jeffrey T. Angley has been in the business of protecting landowners and real estate developers from the past 25 years helping them overcome daunting legal obstacles in residential and commercial projects throughout Eastern Massachusetts. Specifically, condominium and single-family home sales in Massachusetts are going up. On March 13, the Massachusetts Association of Realtors reported that sales of condominiums have been increasing since the same time in 2011, and that the number of condominiums under agreement in February 2012 is up 35.3 percent compared to February 2011. Given that condominium buyer confidence is on the rise, it seems timely to review the relevant documents involved in the sale of a condominium. · Offer to Purchase - the instrument used by the potential buyer to extend an offer to purchase the condominium (or home); the buyer can accept the offer or counteroffer with an alternative set of terms · Purchase and Sale Agreement (P&S) - the instrument executed by both the potential buyer and seller which sets forth the material terms of the transaction, including sale price, deposits, closing date, contingencies such as cash due at closing and the buyer obtaining mortgage financing, and disclosure of other pertinent information · Rider / Addendum / Exhibit - a document sometimes attached to the Purchase and Sale Agreement that further explains or outlines terms contained within the P&S, such as the property description or deadline extensions; these are added either at the time of signing the P&S or afterwards, but only upon mutual agreement of the buyer and seller · Declaration of Trust -the instrument that created the condominium association responsible for undertaking the day-to-day operations of the condominium · Master Deed - the instrument that originally "created" the condominium by submitting the underlying land and buildings to the provisions of M.G.L. c. 183A; it is the governing instrument for the condominium, including provisions for unit dimensions, common areas, voting authority, amendment procedure, fees and other pertinent provisions · By-Laws - these can either be a separate document or part of the Declaration of Trust, and they provide additional rules and regulations governing the condominium units and common areas, such as whether pets are allowed or whether units can be rented out · Unit Deed - this is the instrument that will transfer ownership from the buyer to the seller, and typically indicates the boundaries of the unit and designates exclusive use common areas (either directly or through reference to the Master Deed) · Plans - there should be available a set of plans depicting the common areas of the condominium as well as the individual unit being purchased, including exclusive use common areas Moreover, in instances where the condominium is located on Registered Land, prior Land Court approval may be needed for some documents in advance of the conveyance (i.e. first unit deed or amendments to plans or Master Deed). To ensure that the buyer's interests are fully protected, a careful review of condominium documents by competent real estate counsel is recommended before the sale is finalized. For an in-depth resource about the many aspects of condominiums, check out New England Condominium's website. If you are a landowner or developer in Eastern Massachusetts, the attorney who protects your rights in any real estate legal matter is Jeffrey T. Angley, founding member of the law offices of Jeffrey T. Angley, P.C., and principal of Phillips & Angley.
Protecting your rights especially if you are into the real estate business is quite a daunting task as people tend to think that you have a lot of money to spare to thugs who will use arm twisting measures to get a pie out of your hard earned income. Once you are involved in the real estate business as a developer or as a landowner that you have purchased to develop something on it is of utmost importance to hire a good attorney who can protect your rights from unethical people all around. Jeffrey T. Angley has been in the business of protecting landowners and real estate developers from the past 25 years helping them overcome daunting legal obstacles in residential and commercial projects throughout Eastern Massachusetts, including the South Shore and Cape Cod. Jeffrey T. Angley, P.C. understands that a permitting delay or mid-construction dispute adds substantial costs and other pressures to the underway project. The attorneys at Jeffrey T. Angley, P.C. have made it sure that their clients get swift results through aggressive and target oriented actions. This is done in an effort to protect hard-won land use and zoning permits, and to appeal improper permit decisions. The attorneys here have the knowledge and experience to represent a broad range of clients, including small local businesses, national corporations, real estate developers and individual homeowners. Thus the size of the business or the property is not the real issue, its justice that is the priority at Jeffrey T. Angley, P.C. Having a proven track record of success in appeals of special permits and site plan reviews permits to subdivide land and other land use and zoning restrictions you can rest assured that you are dealing with the right office that will leave no stone unturned to get the desired results from the authorities. Rigorous analysis and effective advocacy to protect the clients legal interest is something that is practiced in spirit at this law office. About Jeffrey T. Angley : If you are a landowner or developer in Eastern Massachusetts, the attorney who protects your rights in any real estate legal matter is Jeffrey T. Angley, founding member of the law offices of Jeffrey T. Angley, P.C., and principal of Phillips & Angley.
Start blogging by creating a new post. You can edit or delete me by clicking under the comments. You can also customize your sidebar by dragging in elements from the top bar.
|
RSS Feed